On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:21 PM, William Unruh <un...@invalid.ca> wrote:
> If you demand that I give > detailed explanation You started off down the ntpd versus chrony path again. "To get the discussion started, lets compare some of the differences between chrony and ntpd" That's not useful. You've spent years talking about chrony vs. ntpd. There's nothing new to be said. > tell me that timed You keep saying timed. Is that part of some plan to deny responsibility in future? I'm talking about NTIMED-CLIENT. I don't know what you mean by TIMED. > is different from ntpd, but > give me no explanation as to how, or how timed differs from ntpd > I've repeated pointed you to Poul-Henning Kamp's notes regarding Ntimed. Why isn't that sufficient? Please provide your parameters for adequate explanation. > > > I've downloaded ntimed which compiled ok so will give it a try in > > a few days. > > Be interesting to see how and what it does. > Since I've told you how it does and what it does is obvious (but just in case -- it disciplines system time by steering it to UTC) you can see why people might think you're not genuinely interested in a discussion. "I have given you detailed answers to your question[s]" Not so much as of yet. But I keep hoping. _______________________________________________ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions