I'd love to be able to assign the mod wheel or some other controller to tempo 
so I could control it in a musical way instead of in a mathematical one.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juan 
Bello
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 9:54 PM
To: QWS list
Subject: Re: QWS List To quantize, or not to quantize

well... first of all.. you should recorrd measures without quantization and 
coppy them to a "dummy track" in case you need those measures again

if there is a part of the song that you feel should not be quantized, then do 
not select it. Use the left and right markers, then control M to quantize your 
selection. That will be your best friend.
inserting tempo events manually is pretty annoying and tedious. if you want a 
constant and smooth ritardando I think its better to use the progresssion tool, 
it saves a lot of work. Select the region that needs to be slowed down and then 
apply the tool. Note: it would be nice if the progression tool would contain 
some number or value that would make it apply a progression randomly, (instead 
of inserting events every 5 ticks or so.. it would be nice to be able to define 
a pattern or let the computer make up a random one within the selected
areas)
Hope this bit helps.

2012/10/27, Nicole Massey <[email protected]>:
> Why do you think it's bee sticky? They should work like they did 
> earlier, but the changes in tempo will make them slower.
> Does QWS have a "Tap Tempo" function, where playing a key on the 
> keyboard can generate tempo maps? If not it'd be a great thing to add, 
> as it is useful both for major changes in tempo and also rubato passages.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
> Of Steve Matzura
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 7:44 AM
> To: QWS list
> Subject: Re: QWS List To quantize, or not to quantize
>
> It does help, but I'm creating the last part, including the rit, by 
> copying previous measures which have already been quantized. This is 
> going to be a sticky wicket I fear.
>
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:50:12 +0100, you wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Nicole is right, Quantise actually alters the note data.
>>
>>Here are two tricks I use for adding a rit at the end:
>>
>>1. Play strictly according to the metronome throughout an entire track.
>>Then add tempo changes where you want the rit.  It is sometimes 
>>difficult to get the tempo changes right, but this is the MIDI 
>>purist's best solution.
>>
>>2. Alternatively, what I do sometimes is play according to the 
>>metronome, but then ignore it when I want to add the rit at the end.
>>Then, quantise *only* the part before the rit.
>>
>>Hope this helps.
>>
>>James.
>>
>>On 25/10/2012, Nicole Massey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Quantization isn't a filter, it's a modification to the track's note 
>>> values, so it's not a switch like that  to alter things.
>>> For ritardandos, I'd suggest using a tempo change instead of
> quantization.
>>> On a broader scale, quantization is good for fixing note flubs and 
>>> the like and if your rhythm isn't the best, but especially for 
>>> percussion tracks don't quantize everything. If you want realistic 
>>> rock drums, for example, quantize everything except the hi-hat, as 
>>> that's where most rock drummers put their feel elements. For jazz 
>>> don't quantize the ride cymbal. This will make your tracks sound 
>>> more
> realistic.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
>>> Of Steve Matzura
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:19 AM
>>> To: QWS list
>>> Subject: QWS List To quantize, or not to quantize
>>>
>>> That is the question. I want to bring a song to a graceful rittard, 
>>> but the quantization keeps getting in the way. Is there a way to 
>>> turn it off, even for selected beats in tracks?
>>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see 
>>> http://lists.andrelouis.com
>>>
>>> for archived list posts, see
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see 
>>> http://lists.andrelouis.com
>>>
>>> for archived list posts, see
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>>>
>>To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
>>
>>for archived list posts, see
>>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
>
> for archived list posts, see 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
>
> for archived list posts, see 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>


--
Juan Pablo Bello
Cel. 313-879-2884
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com

for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com

for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to