That's what I wound up doing but I still don't know how to tell
whether things are or are not quantized, or whether it's on or off.

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:53:48 -0500, you wrote:

>well... first of all.. you should recorrd measures without
>quantization and coppy them to a "dummy track" in case you need those
>measures again
>
>if there is a part of the song that you feel should not be quantized,
>then do not select it. Use the left and right markers, then control M
>to quantize your selection. That will be your best friend.
>inserting tempo events manually is pretty annoying and tedious. if you
>want a constant and smooth ritardando I think its better to use the
>progresssion tool, it saves a lot of work. Select the region that
>needs to be slowed down and then apply the tool. Note: it would be
>nice if the progression tool would contain some number or value that
>would make it apply a progression randomly, (instead of inserting
>events every 5 ticks or so.. it would be nice to be able to define a
>pattern or let the computer make up a random one within the selected
>areas)
>Hope this bit helps.
>
>2012/10/27, Nicole Massey <[email protected]>:
>> Why do you think it's bee sticky? They should work like they did earlier,
>> but the changes in tempo will make them slower.
>> Does QWS have a "Tap Tempo" function, where playing a key on the keyboard
>> can generate tempo maps? If not it'd be a great thing to add, as it is
>> useful both for major changes in tempo and also rubato passages.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> Steve Matzura
>> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 7:44 AM
>> To: QWS list
>> Subject: Re: QWS List To quantize, or not to quantize
>>
>> It does help, but I'm creating the last part, including the rit, by copying
>> previous measures which have already been quantized. This is going to be a
>> sticky wicket I fear.
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:50:12 +0100, you wrote:
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>Nicole is right, Quantise actually alters the note data.
>>>
>>>Here are two tricks I use for adding a rit at the end:
>>>
>>>1. Play strictly according to the metronome throughout an entire track.
>>>Then add tempo changes where you want the rit.  It is sometimes
>>>difficult to get the tempo changes right, but this is the MIDI purist's
>>>best solution.
>>>
>>>2. Alternatively, what I do sometimes is play according to the
>>>metronome, but then ignore it when I want to add the rit at the end.
>>>Then, quantise *only* the part before the rit.
>>>
>>>Hope this helps.
>>>
>>>James.
>>>
>>>On 25/10/2012, Nicole Massey <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Quantization isn't a filter, it's a modification to the track's note
>>>> values, so it's not a switch like that  to alter things.
>>>> For ritardandos, I'd suggest using a tempo change instead of
>> quantization.
>>>> On a broader scale, quantization is good for fixing note flubs and
>>>> the like and if your rhythm isn't the best, but especially for
>>>> percussion tracks don't quantize everything. If you want realistic
>>>> rock drums, for example, quantize everything except the hi-hat, as
>>>> that's where most rock drummers put their feel elements. For jazz
>>>> don't quantize the ride cymbal. This will make your tracks sound more
>> realistic.
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>>>> Of Steve Matzura
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:19 AM
>>>> To: QWS list
>>>> Subject: QWS List To quantize, or not to quantize
>>>>
>>>> That is the question. I want to bring a song to a graceful rittard,
>>>> but the quantization keeps getting in the way. Is there a way to turn
>>>> it off, even for selected beats in tracks?
>>>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see
>>>> http://lists.andrelouis.com
>>>>
>>>> for archived list posts, see
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see
>>>> http://lists.andrelouis.com
>>>>
>>>> for archived list posts, see
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>>>>
>>>To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
>>>
>>>for archived list posts, see
>>>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
>>
>> for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com
>>
>> for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>>
To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com

for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to