Exactly, just like you set the range of pitch-bend from a half-step to a whole octave.
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:17:58 -0400, you wrote: >Yes that would be cool. But there would have to be a range setting that >you could change. Otherwise the range would be from 10 to 480 bpm... >Yikes! Making small and precise changes would be impossible. > >Nicole Massey wrote: >> I'd love to be able to assign the mod wheel or some other controller to >> tempo so I could control it in a musical way instead of in a mathematical >> one. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Juan >> Bello >> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 9:54 PM >> To: QWS list >> Subject: Re: QWS List To quantize, or not to quantize >> >> well... first of all.. you should recorrd measures without quantization and >> coppy them to a "dummy track" in case you need those measures again >> >> if there is a part of the song that you feel should not be quantized, then >> do not select it. Use the left and right markers, then control M to quantize >> your selection. That will be your best friend. >> inserting tempo events manually is pretty annoying and tedious. if you want >> a constant and smooth ritardando I think its better to use the progresssion >> tool, it saves a lot of work. Select the region that needs to be slowed down >> and then apply the tool. Note: it would be nice if the progression tool >> would contain some number or value that would make it apply a progression >> randomly, (instead of inserting events every 5 ticks or so.. it would be >> nice to be able to define a pattern or let the computer make up a random one >> within the selected >> areas) >> Hope this bit helps. >> >> 2012/10/27, Nicole Massey <[email protected]>: >>> Why do you think it's bee sticky? They should work like they did >>> earlier, but the changes in tempo will make them slower. >>> Does QWS have a "Tap Tempo" function, where playing a key on the >>> keyboard can generate tempo maps? If not it'd be a great thing to add, >>> as it is useful both for major changes in tempo and also rubato passages. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >>> Of Steve Matzura >>> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 7:44 AM >>> To: QWS list >>> Subject: Re: QWS List To quantize, or not to quantize >>> >>> It does help, but I'm creating the last part, including the rit, by >>> copying previous measures which have already been quantized. This is >>> going to be a sticky wicket I fear. >>> >>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:50:12 +0100, you wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Nicole is right, Quantise actually alters the note data. >>>> >>>> Here are two tricks I use for adding a rit at the end: >>>> >>>> 1. Play strictly according to the metronome throughout an entire track. >>>> Then add tempo changes where you want the rit. It is sometimes >>>> difficult to get the tempo changes right, but this is the MIDI >>>> purist's best solution. >>>> >>>> 2. Alternatively, what I do sometimes is play according to the >>>> metronome, but then ignore it when I want to add the rit at the end. >>>> Then, quantise *only* the part before the rit. >>>> >>>> Hope this helps. >>>> >>>> James. >>>> >>>> On 25/10/2012, Nicole Massey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Quantization isn't a filter, it's a modification to the track's note >>>>> values, so it's not a switch like that to alter things. >>>>> For ritardandos, I'd suggest using a tempo change instead of >>> quantization. >>>>> On a broader scale, quantization is good for fixing note flubs and >>>>> the like and if your rhythm isn't the best, but especially for >>>>> percussion tracks don't quantize everything. If you want realistic >>>>> rock drums, for example, quantize everything except the hi-hat, as >>>>> that's where most rock drummers put their feel elements. For jazz >>>>> don't quantize the ride cymbal. This will make your tracks sound >>>>> more >>> realistic. >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >>>>> Of Steve Matzura >>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 7:19 AM >>>>> To: QWS list >>>>> Subject: QWS List To quantize, or not to quantize >>>>> >>>>> That is the question. I want to bring a song to a graceful rittard, >>>>> but the quantization keeps getting in the way. Is there a way to >>>>> turn it off, even for selected beats in tracks? >>>>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see >>>>> http://lists.andrelouis.com >>>>> >>>>> for archived list posts, see >>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see >>>>> http://lists.andrelouis.com >>>>> >>>>> for archived list posts, see >>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >>>> >>>> for archived list posts, see >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >>> >>> for archived list posts, see >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >>> >>> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >>> >>> for archived list posts, see >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >>> >> >> -- >> Juan Pablo Bello >> Cel. 313-879-2884 >> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >> >> for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >> >> To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com >> >> for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] >> > >To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com > >for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] To unsubscribe or change list options, see http://lists.andrelouis.com for archived list posts, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
