Andre van Tonder scripsit: > It would be impractical for REPL usage, where the same definition may > be iteratively modified and executed many times during development.
The SML/NJ REPL actually does work like this: if you redefine an identifier, it's a rebinding that doesn't affect any uses that have come before. This can be both good and bad: sometimes it's easier to throw away the ML world rather than redefine all the dependents of a bad definition. -- I now introduce Professor Smullyan, John Cowan who will prove to you that either [email protected] he doesn't exist or you don't exist, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan but you won't know which. --Melvin Fitting _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
