> You'd never get to this point in Scheme, though: we still have `set!'.

If I'm evaluating changed code in my sources after I've updated a
definition, I don't want to have to change it from a `define' form to
a `set!' form.  I just want to reevaluate it.

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to