On Sep 15, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote: >> The SML/NJ REPL actually does work like this: if you redefine an >> identifier, >> it's a rebinding that doesn't affect any uses that have come >> before. This >> can be both good and bad: sometimes it's easier to throw away the >> ML world >> rather than redefine all the dependents of a bad definition. > > Ugh. Let's not do that to Scheme.
You'd never get to this point in Scheme, though: we still have `set!'. -- Brian Mastenbrook [email protected] http://brian.mastenbrook.net/ _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
