Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit: > > The SML/NJ REPL actually does work like this: if you redefine an > > identifier, > > it's a rebinding that doesn't affect any uses that have come before. This > > can be both good and bad: sometimes it's easier to throw away the ML world > > rather than redefine all the dependents of a bad definition. > > Ugh. Let's not do that to Scheme.
We could do that. But it would be wrong. -- What has four pairs of pants, lives John Cowan in Philadelphia, and it never rains http://www.ccil.org/~cowan but it pours? [email protected] --Rufus T. Firefly _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
