On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Per Bothner wrote:

> While a REPL is a very nice tool, it has its limitations;
> the classical REPL probably fits best very dynamic
> languages, with dynamic types, no user-defined classes,
> and a dynamic top-level environment.

Could someone remind me what language we
are discussing again in this list? ;-)

Andre

_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss

Reply via email to