Very cool, I really really like the new set Rolf came up with! I've been playing around with one of the previous versions. It's NOT intended for the logo beauty contest, because it's not near the quality of Rolf's work, but I thought I'd upload it anyway:
http://people.apache.org/~svanderwaal/rave_graphic.png I tried to add some depth to it and make it a little bit more like a record, with the Apache feather as the 'needle on the record'. Sander On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Marlon Pierce <[email protected]>wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Yes to voting next week. They all look very good to me. > > > Marlon > > > On 4/15/11 9:34 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > > Goodness, I am speechless. > > > > +1 to *all* of them. > > +1 to Ross' proposal to call a vote next week (if no other feedback). > > > > Hadrian > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > > > >> On 15/04/2011 13:59, Rolf van der Steen wrote: > >>> Apparently attachments don't work in the mailing list. > >>> I've created a Jira issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RAVE-6 > >> > >> Fantastic! > >> > >> I really like these. I especially like how the "record" has come back > with the "grooves". It also looks like sound waves emanating from the party. > >> > >> All in all a brilliant interpretation of all the ideas and feedback on > the list. > >> > >> I'm +1 for these being out logos (we should really call a proper vote > for this one since it is a largely irreversible decision, lets give it a > couple of days for more feedback) > >> > >> Ross > >> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ciancetta, Jesse E.<[email protected] > >wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Rolf, > >>>> > >>>> I don't see any attachment (and I checked with Matt too - he didn't > see > >>>> anything either) - could you please post you're latest revisions on > the web > >>>> somewhere? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> --Jesse > >>>> > >>>> From: Rolf van der Steen [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:47 AM > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: Re: Logo > >>>> > >>>> All, > >>>> Thnx for the positive feedback! > >>>> I did some more work. Here's an update. > >>>> > >>>> * First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file > which > >>>> allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm. > >>>> * Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a > >>>> preference for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy. > I > >>>> agree; the side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the > >>>> side-elements as an 'average' of simplestyle1 and 2. > >>>> * I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of > reluctant > >>>> at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark > grey), > >>>> but the red actually works really well. > >>>> * I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based > on > >>>> that I included the "(tm)" symbol and created "powered by" and > "inside" > >>>> variations of the logo. > >>>> * I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful, > so I > >>>> couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These > can > >>>> contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well. > >>>> * Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-). > >>>> I've attached an image containing all the variations. > >>>> IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback. > >>>> > >>>> grt, Rolf > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea<[email protected] > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>> Ate, > >>>> > >>>> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although > it's > >>>> not technically a vote). So there: > >>>> > >>>> +1 to both of them. > >>>> > >>>> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the > >>>> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue > that as > >>>> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe > enhancing the > >>>> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome > (pun > >>>> intended) logo, simple and powerful. > >>>> > >>>> Hadrian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > >>>>>> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 > for > >>>> not being as solid. > >>>>> > >>>>> Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these > two is > >>>> chosen. > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Great work, > >>>>>> Hadrian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg< > >>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. > Very > >>>>>>>> sleek. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 I really like - great impact. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg< > >>>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg> > but > >>>> without the feather and with just the "white label" part of the > record. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Great stuff! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ross > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> HIPPO > >>>> Europe * Amsterdam Oosteinde 11 * 1017 WT Amsterdam * +31 20 > 522 > >>>> 4466 > >>>> USA * Boston Cambridge 1 Broadway * Boston MA 02142 * > +1 > >>>> 617 500 6160 > >>>> USA * San Francisco 755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor * Petaluma CA > 94954 * > >>>> +1 877 414 4776 > >>>> www.onehippo.com<http://www.onehippo.com/> * www.onehippo.org< > >>>> http://www.onehippo.org/> * [email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does > not > >>>> waive any related rights and obligations. > >>>> Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it > >>>> contains by other than an intended recipient is > >>>> unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me > (by > >>>> return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> [email protected] > >> @rgardler > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNqEoDAAoJEOEgD2XReDo50uAIAMMAotwKj/k4vezJqXBRiw/g > KcB5AJMHwNJcyiBQ7jNN6h5Yh77Kk8TMV/m+dBA+L4Diwl/Kg7gZrctctv47bWjm > NIw23GWhRHTiy3mnA2cdsQwhPgzMUgaTiydYwajYp/pL2P29Jg2i8srgIGMPWFkh > dDqy8OfFTLvdna+bJPTZDw34/FZ0AYjX+4xP8jcSvrZZ8pUzpjNbKK0Zz1dlimDO > dgQ4ueotcBxl7JUZiJ/4wivZBfCJCyJ307n9dfAR5t0qVogV+uLiDJm5mcfn+1RA > VlUuXyXMpoCLg1ug03PTS/dJ18vWYhUPaNVwdglp2Udp7t84BR/O25p/OVmACH0= > =4jZ8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
