Ate, That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's not technically a vote). So there:
+1 to both of them. I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun intended) logo, simple and powerful. Hadrian On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for not >> being as solid. > > Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is > chosen. > >> >> Great work, >> Hadrian >> >> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> >>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg >>>> >>>> I really like simplestyle1. I think it really jumps out at you. Very >>>> sleek. >>> >>> +1 I really like - great impact. >>> >>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like >>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but without >>> the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record. >>> >>> Great stuff! >>> >>> Ross >> >
