All,
Thnx for the positive feedback!
I did some more work. Here's an update.

   - First of all I bumped up the resolution. Now I've got a file which
   allows hi-res printing of the logo up to 10cm.
   - Next I did some tweaking based on your comments. There was a preference
   for simplestyle1 but main comment was that it is too heavy. I agree; the
   side-elements 'overruled' the word RAVE. I styled the side-elements as an
   'average' of simplestyle1 and 2.
   - I also used a nice bright red for the 'hole'. I was kind of reluctant
   at first (because indeed I thought the hole should be black or dark grey),
   but the red actually works really well.
   - I also looked at the Apache project branding requirements. Based on
   that I included the "™" symbol and created "powered by" and "inside"
   variations of the logo.
   - I think there are situations where a square ratio icon is useful, so I
   couldn't resist creating a light and heavy variation for that. These can
   contain the "powered by" and "inside" additions as well.
   - Then I went overboard and also created a favicon ;-).

I've attached an image containing all the variations.
IMO we're quite there, nevertheless still love to hear your feedback.

grt, Rolf


On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ate,
>
> That's what I meant :). And that's why I didn't cast a vote (although it's
> not technically a vote). So there:
>
> +1 to both of them.
>
> I don't know if you plan any further refinement. Making the dot in the
> middle red for instance to add a touch of color. Now one might argue that as
> the hole in the middle of the vinyl it should be black. Maybe enhancing the
> light diffraction effect on the vinyl side? Anyway, it's an awesome (pun
> intended) logo, simple and powerful.
>
> Hadrian
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
> > On 04/13/2011 08:25 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> >> I like them both. I think I'm slightly more in favor of simplestyle2 for
> not being as solid.
> >
> > Same for me, but both are great so I'd be happy whichever of these two is
> chosen.
> >
> >>
> >> Great work,
> >> Hadrian
> >>
> >> On Apr 13, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 13/04/2011 16:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_simplestyle1.jpg
> >>>>
> >>>> I really like simplestyle1.  I think it really jumps out at you.  Very
> >>>> sleek.
> >>>
> >>> +1 I really like - great impact.
> >>>
> >>> I suspect this would also work really well as an Icon. Square like
> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_appstyle.jpg but without
> the feather and with just the "white label" part of the record.
> >>>
> >>> Great stuff!
> >>>
> >>> Ross
> >>
> >
>
>


-- 
*HIPPO*
Europe  •  Amsterdam  Oosteinde 11  •  1017 WT Amsterdam  •  +31 20 522 4466
USA       •        Boston  Cambridge 1 Broadway  •  Boston MA 02142  •  +1
617 500 6160
USA  • San Francisco  755 Baywood Drive, 2nd floor  •  Petaluma CA 94954  •
+1 877 414 4776
www.onehippo.com  •  www.onehippo.org  •  [email protected]

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not
waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it
contains by other than an intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by
return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.

Reply via email to