At 12:29 AM 12/13/2003, John Andersen wrote:
But wait a minute here...
 His spam detection is already working, and he is routeing this spam
 to his spam folder.  Its just NOT RAZOR that is detecting the stuff
as spam.  He said:

Wait a minute.. Please re-read my post AND the post I was replying to, I think you massively misinterpreted me.


I was not focusing on why razor has a low and/or high hitrate, or how to fix it.

Neils mentioned that he has a low hit rate when mail is delivered, but when he re-scans the SAME MESSAGES a few days later, the hit rate is three times higher.

I was strictly posting an explanation of WHY this jump in hitrate happens when you wait a while between runs of razor-check

So feeding this already-automatically-detected-spam to razor is
going to do NOTHING for his over-all spam detection,

I was not attempting to tell him how to fix anything.


I was not telling him to even DO anything..

I was telling him WHY he sees the behaviors that he's observing.





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Razor-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users

Reply via email to