On Sunday 14 December 2003 13:39, Matt Kettler wrote: > Neils mentioned that he has a low hit rate when mail is delivered, but when > he re-scans the SAME MESSAGES a few days later, the hit rate is three times > higher.
No, Neils said he had a 60% hit rate after RESCANNING mail he submitted already. You would expect that, especially if Neils had "good carma" at Razor. But the point was that Razor, left to its own devices has a 15% hit rate. You might blame it on timeing, because Neils said he only submits once a week or so, but the point remains that the OTHER spam engines DID detect it wher razor failed. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
