>3) If it weren't for VB we wouldn't have the lack of quality of
application
>developers we have today.
I read this as:
Because we have VB, we lack quality developers....probably not what you were
trying to say. Using positives instead of negatives can be more easily
interpreted.
Brent Skean
Current Solutions
-----Original Message-----
From: Crued @ Enteract <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, July 13, 2001 8:05 AM
Subject: RE: IF VB IS SO GOOD WHY ARE YOU USING RBASE!
>Too much here to read. Synopsis...
>
>1) VB Rulz
>2) If it weren't for VB we wouldn't have the quality of application
>development in MANY of the other languages today.
>3) If it weren't for VB we wouldn't have the lack of quality of
application
>developers we have today.
>4) No reason you can't use RBase (Oterro) with VB.
>5) .NET is a platform for the future, yes it's been done before, but now
>the theory will actually work with Microsoft behind it. By your notes, we
>should all be writing COBOL, cause it's still around and hasn't changed
>since the brontosaurus roamed the earth.
>6) You cannot compare an OOP language like VB.NET and Rbase, that's like
>comparing seltzer water to Pepsi. Yes they both have bubbles but one is
>sweet and delicious out of the can, and the other tastes like crap until
>complimented by something sweet and delicious.
>7) Give Bill a hug, he's our friend.
>
>Regards,
>Eric
>
>ps. Did I mention VB kicks ass?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
>Behalf Of Manuel de Aguiar
>Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:44 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: IF VB IS SO GOOD WHY ARE YOU USING RBASE!
>
>
>Hello Mike,
> Oh BOY, .... <several pages of text removed to save you time>
>
