Oh... I forgot to mention that brake feel is more important than outright power 
anyway. Bikes have a small contact patch. It's important to know exactly when 
your tire is at max adhesion at maximum braking, and not past it. I bow out 
now...bye.
Clay 

     On Friday, February 20, 2015 2:34 PM, ted <ted.ke...@comcast.net> wrote:
   

 Clayton,
Your reasoning is mostly wrong, and your stick analogy does not apply.I think 
you are forgetting that the straddle wire provides mechanical advantage. A 
small side force on  a relatively straight cable produces a large tension in 
the cable. In theory, if the cable is straight the leverage is infinite. If you 
correctly analyze any cantilever brake setup you will find that making the 
straddle wire flatter increases the net leverage. Unless of course the cable 
attachment point is at or below the pivot, but I don't think anybody makes 
brakes like that.

On Friday, February 20, 2015 at 10:26:03 AM UTC-8, Clayton wrote:
I have to jump in here.. I have always been taught and discovered on my own, 
that the straddle cable should be as close to perpendicular, or at 90 degrees, 
to the center of the brake pad "lever" when it hits the rim. You can do this 
experiment on your own. Get a stick. Tie a string to it. Lay the stick on the 
ground and lift the string. Lift perpendicularly and then from different acute 
angles, inline with the stick. If you lift from acute angles, the stick slides, 
which is energy wasted. If you set up your brakes with a too short straddle 
cable, you lose feel and the leverage forces change as you apply the brakes. 
Starts out soft and weak, and increases as you apply the brakes because the 
angle gets closer to 90 degrees. Over 90 degrees, and you get weak brakes. The 
brake arm is just a lever. It works best, like all levers if you lift from the 
end at 90 degrees. The brake arm pivot placement is basic too. Long arm on the 
straddle cable side, shorter arm on the rim side. It does not matter at all 
when it comes to straddle cable length. The only lever the straddle cable acts 
on is the long side. The distance between the pivot and rim, and pivot and 
straddle cable angle is fixed and you can't change it. After 20 years plus of 
running cantilevers and being a mechanic for YETI cycles back in the heyday, a 
shop manager and mechanic, I finally gave up.  I run V-brakes now, which are 
much more powerful, especially with long Cool Stop salmon pads. Braking is at 
near disc power. I can easily do a nose wheelie, using brake power alone. The 
feel is so good, I can anti-lock brake the front. Apply, feel it start to 
slide, let loose and rebrake. The only thing I don't like and it is very minor, 
is the hood shape on the Cane Creek Road V-brake levers.  There is far more 
clearance with panniers and I don't poke my calf anymore. Everyone here loves 
their cantilevers. They are prettier and match the aesthetic of Rivendell. I 
get that, but for me the superiority of V-brakes has become beautiful in 
itself. 

On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 7:33:03 PM UTC-8, ted wrote:
Deacon,
The thing is, that definitely does not increase the leverage. 
The the vertical component of the tension in the straddle cable is equal to the 
tension in the brake cable (well half on each side).Lengthening the straddle 
cable reduces the tension in it as well as changing the angle at which it meets 
the brake arm. The vertical component of the tension stays the same, and the 
horizontal component is decreased.The net result is less torque around the 
brake post for a given force on the brake lever.For a wide profile brake like 
the 720, where the end of the arm is barely above the pivot, the decrease in 
leverage is relatively small. But it is a decrease, not an increase. To get an 
increase in leverage by lengthening the straddle cable the end of the brake arm 
would have to be below the pivot.
Again I'm not claiming that the longer straddle cable didn't work better for 
you, just that the cause of the better can't have been increased leverage.

On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 6:56:40 PM UTC-8, Deacon Patrick wrote:
Kellie, I went with touring in the back because I got them used and that's the 
set up that was available. It's a set up common to folks who want the most 
power for the front brake, and clearance for panniers in the rear.
Ted, lengthening the saddle cable make the angle of the brake cable to the 
brake arm closer to 90˚, and that definitely increased leverage. Here's what it 
looked like:https://www.flickr.com/photos/ 32311885@N07/14450777149/in/ 
set-72157645649878184

With abandon,Patrick


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/5HXsqAEXrWM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to