This is a great thread and should serve as a helpful source for people 
considering various Rivendell models. It makes it more helpful, IMO, when 
people chiming in described how they use their bikes. For example, people 
who put their bikes on bus racks, or regularly have to carry them up stairs 
... those are very practical non-riding issues! 

My take on Grant's design evolution is that it's highly influenced by the 
kind of riding he does and where he does it. So, it's not surprising to me 
that Deacon Patrick, who appears to ride similarly over similar (though a 
bit more epic!) terrain as GP. I'll give another example ... I took my 
Quickbeam as a "travel bike" to the San Diego area, where I participated in 
a group ride that, today, would be called a "gravel ride". It was organized 
by an outfitter, who provided cushy full-suspension mountain bikes to 
everyone and tried to dissuade me from using the QB. The terrain reminded 
me a lot of riding trails around Walnut Creek, and the QB put on quite a 
show both ascending and descending some fun singletrack. The bike was very 
much in its element and a joy to ride. 

The lengthening of chain stays offered to me a potential advantage for 
winter commuting, which pretty often involves re-frozen slushy tracks that 
are quite bumpy. All else equal, the longer wheelbase (and longer 
rear-center contribution to that) helps keep the bike moving in the 
intended direction despite the side-deflections from the bumps. I bought a 
Cheviot with the intention of making it my commuting bike, but it never 
worked well for me _for that purpose_. Half of my commute was suburban 
streets, where I wanted to ride 16-20 mph. The other half was a paved 
rail-trail, where 15mph max was a responsible speed. Riding the Cheviot the 
same speed as my other "road" bikes simply wasn't possible, no matter how I 
set up the bars. Milwaukee gets a lot of wind, btw, and winter wind is 
HEAVY!  If I was willing to increase my commute time 50-100%, and if I was 
willing to change from front-loading to rear-loading, it might have worked. 
But it was hard work to ride it, and I ended up re-purposing a lightweight 
randonneur bike as my commuter and loved it.

I have almost no trail-riding opportunities out my door, and I'm not 
usually willing to drive 1-2 hours to find them (another key issue: do you 
like to carry your bike in your car, rather than on it?). I have hundreds 
of kilometers of fabulous paved country roads with good shoulders right out 
my door. So, no surprise, the bikes that work for me are pretty classic 
road bikes. The original prototype Heron Road, with it's "adjustable chain 
stay length" (horizontal drops!)  is still my favorite. The only riding I 
use the Cheviot for is errands, so it permanently carries a pair of 
Carradice rear panniers and a saddle bag. It could use a basket on the 
front for the occasional light, bulky objects.

Also, another good data point is your height/bike size. It's not surprising 
that taller people like longer chain stays, which Grant addressed in his 
recent Reddit exercise. I'm 5'6", 71cm saddle height, so on the shorter 
side for men, and very light weight. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/79bc5a9f-0a85-44cf-ad54-d51c1ff96990%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to