I wonder when Nitto introduced the flexible strut mounts (Mark’s rack) vs.
the rigid struts of the rack on Robert  Tilleys AR. The 700 c AR that I had
came with the same rack as Roberts. Bruce Gordon’s mid rack mounts were not
compatible with that Nitto rack. Steve
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 8:22 AM Greg J <gregkj...@gmail.com> wrote:

> My recollection from one of the early Readers was that Grant felt that
> p-clamps worked just fine, and they offered more flexibility.  A big part
> of the Riv philosophy is that these frames can be used for a long time and
> are not encumbered by fashion.  As others have noted, all racks are
> different, and it would be a pain (and a lot more work) to braze-on
> attachment points, only to have them be useless because the rack doesn't
> fit or the style of racks change (e.g., shift from front panniers to
> baskets).  Now, maybe due to customer demand, I think Rivs have many
> braze-ons, so now he is going the opposite direction of having multiple
> sets of braze-ons still in an effort to make them flexible for different
> rack systems.
>
> Also, I think generally, Grant's aesthetic runs more towards the
> utilitarian-DIY-strap things on by wire and straps, rather than the perfect
> fender lines and perfectly-placed braze-ons for custom racks of Jan's rando
> bikes.
>
> On Wednesday, March 22, 2023 at 5:27:19 PM UTC-7 brok...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I’d be curious to hear what sort of justification Grant had for claiming
>> that p-clamps were superior to actual mid-fork braze ons. To me, a fixed
>> mounting point seems like a secure no-brainer… less fiddly bits, no
>> unsightly black rubber, and it looks so much cleaner.
>>
>> But then again, it wouldn’t surprise me either way.
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2023, at 8:15 PM, Junes <junes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> Hi m f, welcome! Congrats on the bike.
>>
>> Regarding your question:
>>
>> It seems odd to find an All Rounder, or any Riv for that matter, without
>> rack mounts on the upper/mid fork blade. Would this have been a special
>> request to not have them?
>>
>>
>> It’s not totally unusual for Rivs, particularly early-ish ones, to have
>> forks devoid of rack mount eyelets. Two of my Rivs don’t have them, one an
>> Atlantis, explicitly positioned as an all-rounder, and one a Glorius.
>> (Incidentally both were Toyo built.) In an early Atlantis brochure, Grant
>> even wrote that a lack of such fork eyelets is better because using clamps
>> to attach rack struts to forks is superior. All recent Rivs have eyelets
>> galore, though.
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2023, at 19:08, Andrew Letton <let...@flash.net> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Nice bike!
>> My All-Rounder and Road Standard have Joe Bell paint and both have the JB
>> logo on the left chainstay like this:
>>
>> <1679526443662blob.jpg>
>>
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>> Andrew in Sydney
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, March 23, 2023 at 10:03:03 AM GMT+11, m f <
>> rockthr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi - I'm new here! Not sure how many of you saw this on eBay over the
>> past few months, but I was able to work with the seller and found a way to
>> buy this 2000 All-Rounder (Curt Goodrich). I have a couple updates in mind
>> (sweptback handlebar, Brooks saddle), but those will happen with time.
>> First step will be new tires and tuning the mechanicals (Dura Ace except
>> for crankset) so I can get a ride or two under my belt. If the seller is in
>> this group - thanks again for all the help!
>>
>> Questions for the group:
>> It seems odd to find an All Rounder, or any Riv for that matter, without
>> rack mounts on the upper/mid fork blade. Would this have been a special
>> request to not have them?
>> What are the markers that indicate the frame was painted at Joe Bell's
>> shop?
>>
>>
>>
>> <s-l1600.jpg>
>> On Sunday, March 20, 2022 at 8:09:10 PM UTC-5 Patrick Moore wrote:
>>
>> The All Rounder like the XO-1 before it gets a lot of interest and
>> praise, but I think that, like the XO-1 that preceeded it, it is an early
>> design that has been superseded and bettered by later Grantian bikes,
>> starting with the Atlantis and continuing with the Sam Hillborne and
>> doubtless the more recent models.
>>
>> I say this having owned an XO-1 and having bought a custom Road based on
>> the All Rounder, with lighter (753) tubing and slightly more upright hta
>> (IIRC). My 1999 and 2003 Road customs, also built for 26" wheels, are
>> better "All Round" both on pavement and in dirt than either XO-1 and the
>> first Road custom, with much longer chainstays, slightly sacker head, and
>> upsloping tts with extended head tubes.
>>
>> I say again that the later Road customs ride better on dirt, particularly
>> sandy surfaces, than the XO-1 and the first gen, AR-based road custom.
>>
>> I think -- but I am open to reasoned rebuttal -- that an Atlantis or Sam
>> Hill would be better for all round riding than either XOs or ARs.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/dbd9b3f4-d7aa-474e-8ba6-25b46bbfbe02n%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/dbd9b3f4-d7aa-474e-8ba6-25b46bbfbe02n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/392951491.785734.1679526477781%40mail.yahoo.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/392951491.785734.1679526477781%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> <1679526443662blob.jpg>
>> <s-l1600.jpg>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/644E81B5-AD7E-4090-87B1-4D36D8667FC5%40gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/644E81B5-AD7E-4090-87B1-4D36D8667FC5%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/a83ebe54-6e70-463b-a5b3-5d7f142b842en%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/a83ebe54-6e70-463b-a5b3-5d7f142b842en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-- 
Steven Sweedler
Plymouth, New Hampshire

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CALimyfLE%3DcmrvHvA0ySL_%2B90ejC3NNbA7bb8N%2BZ5HERz%3DYi9-w%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to