I've been racking my brain over this ever since the question was posed, and I've finally settled on the perfect (for me) answer: No, and thank god I don't have to. I only have four bikes and not much overlap: A Brompton for the mixed mode commute, Thee Hunqapillar for all-weather go-anywhere do-anything day-or-night, a Santa Cruz Superlight from 2002 for mountain biking, and the perennial "project bike" a 1995 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo e Koo that is notable only for it's sentimental value (the last time I only had one bike, this was it). What's more, to my thinking there a couple of holes to fill: there will always be room for an Atlantis, and I want a lightish, fastish, single speed along the lines of a Quickbeam or some such.
One bike? Never! Besides, being car-free I'm allowed all the bikes I want, right? A great thread; fascinating to see the breadth of perspectives on this. Shawn Seattle, WA On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 6:48:04 PM UTC-8, murphyjrfk wrote: > > Suppose the title says it all. But I've been a thinking about going down > to 1---not a big step down cause I normally only have two three tops o' > working bikes anyways. And the overlap is out of control. How many 26" > touring bikes does one fellow need deal. But I love what I love I guess. > > One bike? Could ya do it and what would it be? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
