I totally support that and especially like your remarks about the English 
language bias.

Myriam.

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Leonard, William
Sent: August-08-13 2:38 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Capitalization in 2.9.4.4

The Canadian Committee on Cataloguing has also put forward a proposal 
concerning capitalization, 6JSC/CCC/12.
Please ignore the asterisks that were unintentionally included in the final 
draft.
http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-CCC-12.pdf

Bill

Bill Leonard
Information Standards Specialist  |  Spécialiste des normes de l'information
william.leon...@bac-lac.gc.ca<mailto:william.leon...@lac-bac.gc.ca>
Telephone   |  Téléphone : +1-819-994-6936
Facsimile   |  Télécopieur : +1-819-934-6777 (new)
Content Management Division, Metadata Sharing, Open Data | Division de gestion 
des contenus, Échange de métadonnées, Données ouvertes
Library and Archives Canada  |  Bibliothèque et Archives Canada
550 De la Cité blvd  |  550, blvd de la Cité
Gatineau, Québec  K1A 0N4
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
www.collectionscanada.gc.ca<http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca>



From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Lapka, Francis
Sent: August-08-13 10:58 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Capitalization in 2.9.4.4

This topic is the subject of proposal to be put forth to JSC later this year.

See 6JSC/LC/24 (particularly in the neighborhood of change #10):
http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/6JSC-LC-24.pdf



_________________________________
Francis Lapka, Catalog Librarian
Yale Center for British Art, Department of Rare Books and Manuscripts
1080 Chapel Street, PO Box 208280, New Haven, CT  06520
203.432.9672    francis.la...@yale.edu<mailto:francis.la...@yale.edu>





From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Joan Wang
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:29 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Capitalization in 2.9.4.4

> OR, to simplify things further, and perhaps even better yet, we should get 
> rid > of the "(other than solely publishing)" instruction at 2.8.4.4 and just 
> apply the > 'principle of representation' (0.4.3.4) to  'put down what we 
> see' for publisher > data also.
Deborah, thanks for pointing it out. I actually thought about that. But my 
concern is that the element title is Publisher's Name. We transcribe a 
publisher's name in the form as it appears on the source (the representation 
principle). I am not sure if the statement of function is supposed to be a part 
of a publisher's name. I do not mind the removal of "other than solely 
publishing" in instruction at 2.8.4.4. But it seems to be a big difference :) 
At least the relevant instructions in the three statements are not consistent.
Thanks,
Joan Wang

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Deborah Fritz 
<debo...@marcofquality.com<mailto:debo...@marcofquality.com>> wrote:
This is a display issue that should be handled by the ILS setup.

If the distributor information is displayed in a single line, along with the 
publisher, etc. information, as ISBD requires, then it is logical to retain the 
words or phrases indicating functions other than publishing, as per AACR:

260    $a Boulder : $b East European Monographs ; $a New York : $b Distributed 
by Columbia University Press, $c 2010.
Displays as:
Publication, etc.:  Boulder :  East European Monographs ; New York : 
Distributed by Columbia University Press, 2010.

If the distributor information is in a separate MARC field (264_2) and is 
therefore not displayed in a single line, then there should not be any point in 
including the 'Distributed by' wording, since the ILS can be set up to display 
the separate field labeled according to the second indicator:

264  1 $a London ; $a New York : $b I.B. Tauris, $c 2012.
264  2 $a New York : $b Distributed in the United States and Canada exclusively 
by Palgrave Macmillan, $c [2012]
Displays as:
Publication: London ; New York : I.B. Tauris, 2012.
Distribution: New York : Distributed in the United States and Canada 
exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan, [2012]

The only reason for not displaying the field label for separate 264, is to try 
to make it look like ISBD:

Displays as:
Publication: London ; New York : I.B. Tauris, 2012.
                         New York : Distributed in the United States and Canada 
exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan, [2012]

But this doesn't display as per ISBD anyway, so it does seem that it might be 
time to treat these statements as separate and distinct, in which case I agree 
that the RDA instructions could be changed for both Distribution and 
Manufacture, with the addition of "(other than solely distributing)" and 
"(other than solely manufacturing)"

OR, to simplify things further, and perhaps even better yet, we should get rid 
of the "(other than solely publishing)" instruction at 2.8.4.4 and just apply 
the 'principle of representation' (0.4.3.4) to  'put down what we see' for 
publisher data also.

Deborah

P.S. It is good to know about A.7B1 after all these years (how did I miss 
that??) but I still wonder what the rationale was for this capitalization, 
given the way it was meant to be displayed, in a string.

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
Deborah Fritz
TMQ, Inc.
debo...@marcofquality.com<mailto:debo...@marcofquality.com>
www.marcofquality.com<http://www.marcofquality.com>

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>] On 
Behalf Of rball...@frontier.com<mailto:rball...@frontier.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 9:23 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Capitalization in 2.9.4.4

Joan, I disagree with your proposed rule change only because, unless one's 
local system is set up to specifically display something to the user that 
indicates that they are seeing a distribution statement (based on indicator 2), 
the user might wonder why there are two separate statements with no seeming 
difference. If the "distributed by" statement is included in $b of the 264, the 
role of the distributor is clear.

Thanks,

Kevin Roe
Supervisor, Media Processing
Fort Wayne Community Schools
Fort Wayne, IN 46802

From: Joan Wang 
<jw...@illinoisheartland.org<mailto:jw...@illinoisheartland.org>>
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Capitalization in 2.9.4.4

I look at corresponding examples in AACR2, they are capitalized.
Also, the following examples in RDA 2.9.4.4 are misleading. The recording or 
supplying of the function, such as distributed by and [distributor], is not 
necessary in RDA records. The second indicator 2 of 264 fields already 
indicates its function.

Distributed by Independent Publishers Group
Distribution by: MapArt Publishing Corporation
Distributed by Coach House Records Ltd.

Voluntary Committee on Overseas Aid & Development [distributor]
Guild Sound and Vision [distributor]

The rule should be changed like this:

2.9.4.4 Record words or phrases indicating the function (other than solely 
distributing) performed by a person, family, or corporate body as they appear 
on the source of information.
My opinion!

Thanks,
Joan Wang
Illinois Heartland Library System

On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Heidrun Wiesenmüller 
<wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de<mailto:wiesenmuel...@hdm-stuttgart.de>> wrote:
It beats me why the examples in 2.9.4.4 (and other similar rules, e.g. 
2.10.4.4) are all capitalized, e.g.:
Distributed by New York Graphic Society
Sold by Longman

I cannot find any justification for this in appendix A. It's certainly not 
mentioned among the elements where the first word must always be capitalized.

Corresponding examples in the ISBD consolidated (4.2.5) aren't capitalized, 
e.g.:
distributed by Harvard University Press
to be sold by Jas. Gardner

So, is there something I've overlooked, or is this a mistake in RDA?

Heidrun

--
---------------------
Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A.
Stuttgart Media University
Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany
www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi<http://www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi>



--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409<tel:618.656.3216x409>
618.656.9401Fax




--
Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D.
Cataloger -- CMC
Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office)
6725 Goshen Road
Edwardsville, IL 62025
618.656.3216x409
618.656.9401Fax

Reply via email to