I did some research on the modules we've used over the past 15+ years to see if we had potential mismatched connector issues. We've used Amphenol H4 connects since the advent of locking solar connectors.  We had assumed they were compatible back then.

Solarworld switched from MC4 to H4 somewhere back 2013 to 2015. I didn't even notice. SW 280s through SW 300 looks like H4, while SW 270s and back to the long, skinny SW 165s are MC 4, but its not that clear, as I found a spec sheet for an SW 260 with an H4.

_Conclusion: Basically we can't be sure._

Hanwa Q cell, looks like their 60 cell mods run the MC 4 or MC 4 compatible (whatever that means) while their 72 cell mods apparently use the H4/ UTX

_Conclusion: Total confusion in the field._

Jinko?  They don't even list the connector type on any of the spec sheets I have for the past few years.

_Conclusion: No way for a designer/ installer to know beforehand what connector to use in the field._

Basically this is a total break down of responsibility for the solar industry; a complete lack of standards. Why hasn't an organization like NEMA stepped in to standardize the connectors like all AC connectors have been, going back for over a century?

I made a very wrong assumption that when our industry adopted the MC 4/ H4 locking type connectors that they were standardized and compatible.   I can only hope that my systems running at relatively low voltage (<150 vdc) will not have issues.


Ray Walters
Remote Solar
303 505-8760

On 9/4/19 4:26 PM, Jerry Shafer wrote:
Just to add, l had a lab and l did testing on connectors, we found that most of the aec issues were under low light. This appeared to be when iradiance was low and once the irads went up the issue was less likely, this was because the Male-female contact was not tight enough and under lower power it would arc instead of heating up and expanding. I used a IR Camera but could see little change due to the plastic. Then l used an IV curve tester and shaded partially shaded the module after several repeat testing the connectors got warm. I would suggest making your own connector pull out tool to check the contact pressures. This is where you may find your problem components. It appears that early am testing had lower volts and the inverter pushed the current up and causes the loose connector to fail due to the lower volts. This testing was done both in the field 1/2 meg and lab testing results were very close. The modules used for testing were Trina and the field inverters were ABB and Fronius
Sorry for the long note
Jerry

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019, 2:52 PM Steven Lawrence <lawrenceste...@gmail.com <mailto:lawrenceste...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Everyone,

    Just to add to this, I've seen multiple melted connectors that
    couldn't be traced to anything other than mixing manufacturers. 
    I've seen some connectors where you can clearly seeing arcing on
    the pin itself and nowhere else.  The crimps and the housing were
    fine.  I've postulated it had to do with slightly different metals
    expanding/contracting at different rates.  I've made it a very
    hard rule at my company to never mix manufacturers of connectors. 
    When we order modules, we specifically have the PO call out the
    manufacturer of the connector (can't just be "MC4 compatible"). 
    Typically we order that same brand of connectors, but sometimes we
    end up getting 6" jumpers made by a harness company (there are
    some connectors out there that can only work with #12 wire. Can't
    use them on #10 homeruns).  It's drastically cut down on the
    number of melted connectors.  We've averaged maybe 1 or 2 on 6MW
    projects over a year with this hard requirement versus 100+ we had
    on a 1MW rooftop project that mixed multiple manufacturers.

    Steven Lawrence
    _______________________________________________
    List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

    List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
    <mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>

    Change listserver email address & settings:
    http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

    List-Archive:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

    List rules & etiquette:
    www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
    <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>

    Check out or update participant bios:
    www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org>


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to