On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 12:09:43 +0100, "Jörg F. Wittenberger" <joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net> wrote: > Attached a slightly better version of the "add types" patch. This one > replaces (values) with a (no-values) syntax from the compatibility layer > and has those procedures, which used to return no values or undefined > values type-annotated as returning undefined.
Thanks! I had to tweak them, but we now use (no-values). Note: Yesterday I added annotations for some of the procedures you didn't annotate. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
