>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> In other words, take a text doc, convert it to a single HTML
> >> page, put some links in it there and there, a TOC, and INDEX, and
> >> a bunch of <NAME> anchors and you've got basically what I'm
> >> looking for... I can use LYNX easily, but info doesn't cut it
> >> for ease of accessing information. A more appropriate name for
> >> the program is "impossinfo" or "deinfo" or even better
> >> "info-withnobasenamedocumentation". ;o)
> >>
> >> Heheh. Don't you love trashing programs that suck? ;o) Gets
> >> some steam off... ;o)
> >>
> >
> >Please reread this slowly three times: "Info pages are supposed to be
> >read with Emacs not with info".
>
> Supposed to? Says who? So I'm _supposed to_ learn emacs, which
> I have no use for, just so I can have a better UI to info
> documents? Sorry, no thanks. info2html is the better UI for me.
>
You are not supposedc to learn Emacs. You are supoposed to read info
pages with it and that is a different thing. It provides aUI whose is
leagues ahead of lynx's. About Info the progarm I agree: it was
designed for masochists. But you see its target was VI users...
--
Jean Francois Martinez
Project Independence: Linux for the Masses
http://www.independence.seul.org
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
