>
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Darren Line wrote:
>
> ... body of message snipped ...
>
> > **********************************************************************
> > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
> > may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the addressee
> > and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended
> > recipient or the person responsible for delivering this e-mail
> > to the intended recipient you are advised that you have
> > received this e-mail in error and any disclosure, copying, distribution
> > or action taken in reliance on the contents of this e-mail is
> > strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please advise the sender
> > immediately if you are not the intended recipient.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > http://www.pearson-jones.co.uk
> >
> <flame on>
>
> will you please, fer cryin' out loud, trim that insipid signature??
> sheesh.


> first, that sig is waaaaaaay too long.  and more to the point,
> it's completely nonsensical for this forum.  "The information
> contained in this e-mail is confidential ..."  yeah, right.
> so that's why you're posting it to a worldwide mailing list,
> yes?

You make a good point about pointless bullsh!t in .sigs.  Nobody wants to
see your 50 lines of ASCII art that often.

However, (and I'm leaping to just as large a conclusion as you have) did you
even stop to consider that his smtp server at his company just might be
automatically appending this to each outgoing message?  Who would want this
crap on their messages anyway?

So, anyway, you made good points, but I'll bet it's out of his control.....

Eric Cifreo
Austin, TX


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to