On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Greg Wright wrote: > Another thought is, its very possible for the CPU to reach 100% for various > reasons for small periods of time, I wonder if the modem will get the > attention it needs, or will it drop the carrier ? > It will drop carrier. I work for an ISP and I've seen it happen. That's one reason we tell people to disable anything that eats up CPU time when they've got a winmodem. Things like sound, etc. :-) John -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Michael H. Warfield
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source rpjday
- netzero and linux Charles Galpin
- Re: netzero and linux Joe Briggs
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source CH
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Greg Wright
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Alan Mead
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Dave Reed
- RE: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Ward William E PHDN
- RE: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Greg Wright
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source John Aldrich
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Chris Lynch
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Adam Sleight
- SSH2 and ChRoot Wes Owen
- Re: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Chris Lynch
- RE: winmodems vs. Lucent vs. open source Ward William E PHDN
- linux modems site Chris Lynch
- Re: linux modems site Eric Clover
- Re: linux modems site John Aldrich
- Re: linux modems site Nitebirdz