RH5.0 came out in 1997-98. That's hardly a Win3.0 contemporary. More like
Win95/98. Right?
HB
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [RHL] Re: ABC's of Linux Red Hat 5.0
> On 20 Dec 2000, syed riyaz wrote:
>
> > I have recently installed the Red Hat LINUX 5.0
>
> Why did you choose such an ancient version? 7.0 was released months ago
> and solves lots of problems.
>
> Red Hat Linux 5.0 didn't have a usable interface for people who aren't
> used to the Unix way of things - both KDE and GNOME appeared later than
> that.
>
> > I have not seen such a poor & scaled-down graphics in my life, I don't
> > know why the world is overwhelming with it, while it seems me much
> > inferior as compared MS-Windows.
>
> Compare Red Hat Linux 5.0 with MS Windows 3.0, it's from the same
> timeframe.
>
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
