Hello David,

Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 5:58:40 PM, you wrote:

DT> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
DT> Hash: SHA1

DT> ABrady wrote:

>>> Dumb newbie question, but what do people use in place of linuxconf?
>>> This isn't installed, by default, for my RH7.1 system.
>>
>>Commandline. Linuxconf is available in 7.1. But, it's still dangerous to
>>some config files and permissions get changed sometimes. I thought it
>>was over that in 7.1 and after. Then someone else stated problems they
>>were having, and later it happened to me again.

DT> Indeed.  The point we, the smartasses, were making is that Linuxconf
DT> is a good idea that just happens to be a bad idea.  With all due
DT> respect to its author, who undertook an incredibly ambitious task,
DT> it's just too flaky in practice.  Further -- and though I freely admit
DT> that this is a philosophical matter and not a technical one, I know
DT> that many here share the sentiment -- tools like Linuxconf teach you
DT> little or nothing about the system, and that's not helpful to you in
DT> the long run.  

DT> I hasten to add that one genuinely good use for front ends like that
DT> is to watch what they do to the actual configuration files, and learn
DT> from it. (Learning to configure fetchmail is a whole lot easier when
DT> you see how fetchmailconf builds a .fetchmailrc, for instance.) I just
DT> don't think Linuxconf is the best tool for that.

DT> So may we counter your question with one of our own: with what 
DT> configuration, specifically, would you like assistance?

DT> - -d


I vote that we bury linuxconf.

-- 
Best regards,
 Badger                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to