On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:02:20AM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote: > Glen Lee Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 5) Having a tight firewall is like living in a fenced in yard. No one > > can get in, but you can't get out. I have no desire to live on an > > island. > > I found it a big pain in the butt fussing with ipchains and then > iptables too so finally got a hardware firewall/router. [...]
> It is what is known as `statefull' and allows full NATing with fairly > simple choices on a java based interface. > > That just means it knows what connections go to which machine and how > to translate them. It is a switched hub which is one step toward > security by itself. The NATing just means you can earmark an internal > machine as a server of just about any type, and have the router send > connections on that port to the earmarked machine only. [...] No fancy Java-based interface, but you can get stateful firewalling and NAT with an OpenBSD machine as well - and those folks have a good track record and - contrary to Linux, unfortunately - *excellent* documentation and man pages. I've been using it on an old Sparc Classic as firewall for my small home network for quite some time. See http://www.opensbsd.org My EUR0.02, Thomas -- http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html ...'cause only lusers quote signatures! Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.ribbrock.org | ICQ#: 15839919 "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list