That's funny...I don't think I've ever seen SA whack these as spammy for the XXXs. <G>
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Cowles, Steve wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Burger > > Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 9:50 AM > > Subject: Re: Problem of NAT and DNS > > > > BTW...someone else had noted, earlier, that they seemed to > > think that the address space you're using belonged to someone > > already, and that you should renumber. > > That was probably me. My point was -- why was the OP naming the hosts with > triple x within a zone already using a private address space. i.e. > 172.16.0.0. I interpreted the triple x stuff as the OP attempt to hide the > public IP stuff. > > BTW: The reason I have not seen any of these posts is spamassassin is > flagging these e-mails as spam because they contain triple x's within the > body. So they just end up in /dev/null. I have now added this list to SA's > white list. > > Steve Cowles > > > > -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
