| I do think an inmate's dietary demands based on religion could be denied. I just can't imagine a situation where they would indeed need to be -- where the religious dietary demands are such that compliance is much of burden. It is not a burden to serve beans as well as beef; chicken as well as pork. One dietary demand that could be refused: wine in communion, I should think -- if all alcohol is banned. Steve On Jun 1, 2005, at 5:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Prof. Steven D. Jamar vox: 202-806-8017 Howard University School of Law fax: 202-806-8428 2900 Van Ness Street NW mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Washington, DC 20008 http://www.law.howard.edu/faculty/pages/jamar "I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits." Martin Luther King, Jr., (1964, on accepting the Nobel Peace Prize) |
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
