Re: Nullifying RLUIPA

[Hamilton02]

I'm always learning something new.  The Senate voted separately on communion wine in the context of debating RFRA?  I thought I had read it all, but maybe not.    Marci   In a message dated 6/2/2005 4:55:14 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If there is any one dietary demand that cannot be refused, communion wine is it.  The issue came up in the Senate debates on RFRA and by a thumping two-to-one vote, the Senate agreed with me.  If one looks at the question in historical context, the case against denying communion wine is overwhelming.

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.