I had seen it, Howard, but did not include it in my post because it's such an idiosyncratic case and hasn't been addressed on the merits yet by a district court, let alone any court of appeals. In a certain respect, I suppose, it's a bit like a modern, RFRA-version of *Mozert*.
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Friedman, Howard M. < howard.fried...@utoledo.edu> wrote: > Marty-- Have you seen yesterday's 8th Circuit opinion that could open a > whole new line of challenges? > http://religionclause.blogspot.com/2015/07/8th-circuit-parents-have-standing-to.html > > ------------------------------ > *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [ > religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] on behalf of Marty Lederman [ > lederman.ma...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, July 20, 2015 12:23 PM > *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > *Subject:* Developments in contraceptive coverage > > FYI, a post on developments of the past few months, in three parts: > > http://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/07/update-on-contraception-coverage.html > > *First*, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the > religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit > employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). *Second*, a summary of the courts > of appeals' treatment of the nonprofit challenges. And *third*, a > discussion of the handful of *cert. *petitions that already have been > filed in the nonprofit cases--with particular emphasis on the theories of > complicity that those petitions allege in support of the argument that the > accommodation imposes a "substantial burden" on the plaintiffs' religious > exercise. > > I'd be very grateful if listmembers would let me know if I've gotten > anything wrong, or overlooked anything of note. And if you become aware of > any further court of appeals decisions or cert. petitions, please let me > know ASAP, so that I can update. Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as > private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or > wrongly) forward the messages to others. >
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
