Hello Skip,
Very good and well written.
What is going on here of late is Part 17 of the FCC rules that puts a lot of
things back on the owner of the tower site. I my self own a few towers and
the paper work is a pain not like the good ole days when no one cared.
Very best of 73,
Russ, W3CH
----- Original Message -----
From: "skipp025" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 6:27 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Yugo radios
> > , JOHN MACKEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Regarding the Maggiore, if the user is happy
> > then I guess that is all that matters.
>
> Not really, what appears in operation on the air
> is what matters most. If any circuit appears on
> the air near me with problems, I'm going to tell
> the owner to fix it.
>
> > There are many that have had bad experiences
> > with that equipment.
>
> It's not limited to Maggiore, I've had trouble with
> one of at least every brand radio. Both Motorola
> and GE are not sin free players. Everyone improves
> or goes by the wayside. The last two current model
> Maggiore Repeaters I've gone over are really nice
> well made designs.
>
> > This reminds me of a article in the newspaper
> > the other day. They did an article on the
> > Yugo brand of cars, discussing how so many
> > people dislike them but a certain few are very
> > loyal and happy.
>
> Not limited to Yugo... I've had a love hate
> relationship with English made motor products and
> have the oil catch pan to prove it. Not to mention
> the dark side of Lucas Ignition and Electrical
> Systems.
>
> > Maybe the Maggiore & Yugos have a lot in common.
>
> Yugo is long out of business. Maggiore products
> have been improved and they are still around, doing
> very well. When you call them on the phone, a real
> person answers and will talk to you.
>
>
> > If it were me & type acceptance was a problem, I
> > would use the Micor or Mastr II as the receiver
> > & the Maggiore as the transmitter.
> > "russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > THE FCC! They came off the list a few years back.
>
> The posture taken by the FCC the few times I've had to interact with
> them over interference problems; the equipment owner or licensee is
> the responsible party. Regardless of equipment type acceptance (which
> they never seem to ask about), technical problems should be resolved
> before they make a visit.
>
> your results might vary...
>
> cheers
> skipp
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
