Chris Carruba wrote: > I'm sorry but I cannot resist the following.. um comment / opinion > > It really amuses me how many get stressed over whether someone else > seeking info on something is properly licensed to perform such > tasks.. I mean really.. get a life and stop policing the list :) > > > Best Regards, > > > Chris Carruba (WQIK389)
And what makes me mad is how many people don't bother to look to see if something is legal or not. This case, while I have no doubt they are licensed, the question still remains whether it is legal to repeat one to the other. Cross service repeating is not legal. Repeating a business pool channel to a public safety pool is a no-no. Repeating Part 90 to Part 95 (GMRS) is a no-no. As long as all freqs involved are public safety freqs, all is well. And the UHF is at least FB2 or higher. This is something he has to look into.
