not to worry
it's 'DIGITAL' and that cures all ills.............
G
----- Original Message -----
From: AJ
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] (OT) APCO P25 horror stories anyone?
It's amazing when talking to the "techs" deploying our regional 700 MHz P25
Mother /\/\ system about the requirements for SNR, they had absolutely no
understanding of the concept of C/NR and how the existing analog UHF
infrastructure already suffered from poor performance - simply replicating the
exact same sites with 700 MHz digital equipment was simply engineering a doomed
system.
Too many times it seems the existing underlying issues of a system are
overlooked or forgotten when deploying a new system directly on top of it.
Oh well - my tax dollars at work... Again...
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Gary Glaenzer <glaen...@verizon.net> wrote:
yes, remember the claims of 'extended dynamic range' ??
now, producers and 'artists' want every bit to be a '1'
look at a current 'hit' with Adobe Audition
it has all the 'dynamic range' of a concrete block
Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Plack
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] (OT) APCO P25 horror stories anyone?
>Somehow, at some point, possibly about the time the compact disc was
introduced, the world started defining "audio quality" solely as
"signal-to-noise ratio."
>Anyone with a new mobile device who mocks "old analog bag phones" has
forgotten how great they sounded.
>73,
>Paul, AE4KR
