>i agree that "fixing" tags is the best route... but what i am proposing >is for a better exp for the unsophisticated user. > It's not a better experience. I am suprised, because you are always saying that SbS shouldn't guess, but that is what you are asking for here.
iTunes for example displays a simple grid of data. It will show what it has read from tags. If you have 50 songs on an album with disk numbers present and one doesn't have a disk number, it won't assume a disk number for it. Such logic can get complex. You say if you have 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, then a song without a disk tag can be assumed to be 4/4, but that is just a guess. There's no logic to go on. What if there were 1/4 and 4/4 with several files without disk number tags? And what about disk tags without total disks? As the scanner reads tags, and then works out groupings in a subsequent scanning phase, this can get complex. _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
