Philip Meyer;478914 Wrote: > > >I suppose that 1/1 could be treated as a special case, because 1/1 > >implies that it's *not* a multiple disc album to begin with (assuming > >that the 1/1 tag is correct). > > What if the disk number is set, but not total disks? > > I don't like special cases. I think disk 1/1 is rather naff, and has > no place in a music library. In fact, I don't use disk tags at all now; > I change all tracks to be contiguous across the album as a whole. I > know some rippers like to set disk 1 of 1, but it's a little bit mad. Yeah, I thought about that, especially because I rarely use disc tags, and when I do, I _never_ use x/y. And I think 1/1 is pretty crazy. You could have another special case where if all the tags for that album are either disc=<blank> or disc=1 SBS could make the same assumption as with 1/1, ie, that the tracks are all on one disc. But that's getting into unwarranted guessing again. Bottom line is SBS shouldn't have to try to divine the truth hiding behind lousy tags -- just fix the tags.
-- aubuti ------------------------------------------------------------------------ aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=70494 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
