BJW wrote: > hi MrC, > > did u see this: > > http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?101129-Question-for-Erland > > I don't use jrmc, are you considering making it standalone? > > I would like to see dupes detected reported and ordered like this: > > the most dupes first, followed by the degree of confidence, and > irrespective of format or other stats. > > so if I have "superstition" duped 10 times, and that's the most, that > should be first. and if I have another song 10 times, but at a lower > degree of confidence, that songs set of ten should be the second set > shown. 9 dupes third, and so on. > > also, one song should be considered the "baseline" (perhaps at first by > comparing to an online db, and then after by letting the user assign it) > and the degree of confidence for each dupe should be a % listed for each > dupe against that baseline. > > I would also like to see the hashs stored as a custom tag in the file, > so it doesn't need recalculated when its done once. and a standalone DB > so rescans are quick, and so it can be taught when its wrong. > > :) that'll take you, what, 6, 7 minutes?
Hi BJW, No, I had not read the thread. While one could take my script and its accompanying scriptlet that interfaces with JRiver's Media Center and modify it to work with another tagging program, it doesn't lend itself to this naturally. It relies on how MC works, to grab the track filenames and their metadata, and to push back new or updated metadata, and MC's ability to perform arbitrary sorting and string-based dup detection in it database search filters (it is the unique per song MD5 string that is used as the basis for dup detection). So you're asking for building a new app, with its own database, complete with query/sort, file tag writing capabilities, a UI or other means of meeting your request to assign the "baseline", etc. In essence, it is rebuilding software that already exists today and works very well. Acoustic Fingerprinting is not quick by any means. It doesn't take too much time to calculate the "codes", but sending them to the track/musicality identification server and awaiting the response is not what I'd call fast. Its the type of thing that Music IP would do, and its the type of thing you fire off and wait until it completes. It can tell you the track and artist name; not the album, track #, disc #, or anything related to what we think of as a "release" or "album" (because the same track may appear on hundreds of releases or albums). You can review this page: http://echoprint.me/start for other options (e.g. MusicBrainz). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MrC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=468 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=101282 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
