I think we could poll for that. In that case I would vote for something built on Openbox, or Xfwm which I think are more suitable for audio application. However if we are in the process of evaluating an alternative why not doing a good study of performance between the available options? Maybe involving "crazy" guys from Linux Audio community :-) Il giorno gio 15 ott 2015 alle ore 08:35 Rick Thomas <r...@kptz.org> ha scritto:
> > I don’t know if it’s available on CentOS, but the “mate” (pronounced > “mahtay” as in “yerba mate”) desktop, which is available in Debian, is a > fork of GNOME that attempts to reproduce the GNOME 2 user interface and > still be compatible with newer systemd based init systems. I use it on > several systems as my first choice GUI. > > Rick > > On Oct 14, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Frederick Gleason <fr...@paravelsystems.com> > wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2015, at 16:37 18, Rob Landry <41001...@interpring.com> > wrote: > > > >> I find mention of a beta Appliance on Centos 7, but no mention of > Rivendell 3.0. I fear I've missed a post. > > > > No Rivendell 3 at the moment. There is a (presently somewhat stalled) > BA3, for which I am currently evaluating alternative desktops (as I’ve come > to the conclusion that GNOME 3 is a complete and utter basket case). I’ve > been using it for a couple of months now as my default environment and it > *doesn’t* get any better. Quite the opposite actually. > > > > Stay tuned… > > > > Cheers! > > _______________________________________________ > Rivendell-dev mailing list > Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org > http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev >
_______________________________________________ Rivendell-dev mailing list Rivendell-dev@lists.rivendellaudio.org http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
