2008/11/5 Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Jonathan Gordon wrote: > >> I'm not against the idea, but I wonder what the point of releasing so >> often is unless there was something big? > > I totally submit to the idea of doing regular time-based releases no matter > if anything "big" is done or not. For the sake of offering "stable" releases > to the crowds and to keep us on our toes by making sure we try to fix bugs > and actually ship that stable thing every three months. > > Besides, doing the releases this way is not a large effort once we're on > this train. > > -- > > / daniel.haxx.se >
I just wonder if it will start being pointless like the dailies? Especially if the actually releasing part is scripted, then its just a repackaged daily anyway. Sure the first one or two might have the full support and done properly with actual decisions about what is a show stopper and what isnt but would be really good to fix, but eventually we might lose interest.
