Frank Gevaerts wrote:
I think there's a reasonable chance that attempted 3-month cycles will
turn out to take 4 months anyway (and 4-month atempts would take 5
months), so I think staying with 3 months is a good idea
Frank
Well, realistically, we'd be setting dates to start the freezes as well
as end, so we'd end up with shorter periods between releases, rather
than less releases. Under that argument it might be better to have 3 per
year, that way if the freezes run long, we still have plenty of time
between them.
