> > * Releases happen every 3 months, with the date of 3.0 (23rd > > September) being the reference point, so releases would be: > > > > Any opinions/objections? > > Only one: I think it should be 4 months between releases, to > leave a longer window for features to go in and mature. I > think the amount of people who'd run a 3-month old stable > build, but not a 4-month old one, is vanishingly small, so > adding that extra month probably won't inconvenience a lot of users.
I'm also for the 4-month-cycle. Apart from the freeze we should also put in a tracker cleanup week (or more). Peter
