Sorry about that. I guess I have read a lot of technical papers ;P On 25 February 2016 at 12:47, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.mailli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay ignore me, we cleared it up in IRC. David means significant, I've > just never heard ........ nevermind ...... > > If moving to git will increase the likelihood of patches from outside the > team, then that in itself is a good enough reason to move IMO. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ged Murphy [mailto:gedmurphy.mailli...@gmail.com] > Sent: 25 February 2016 11:26 > To: 'ReactOS Development List' <ros-dev@reactos.org> > Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Consideration for migrating from Subversion to Git > > > I think the real goal with moving to a platform such as github is > > reducing the entry barriers for new contributors. As it has been > > mentioned already, almost all projects who moved from SVN with "send > > patches" contribution system, to Git/Hg with Pull Requests have got > > non-negligible growth in contributions. > > I'm confused, maybe it's your use of a double negative (non-negligible), > but that sounds contradictory? > Are you saying that projects that have moved from SVN to git have had no > growth or good growth in contributions? > > Ged. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
