Should start another thread for Audio.

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Pranay Pratyush <pranay.praty...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi there, are any devs here with whom I can discuss the audio architecture
> of ReactOS in order to know its current state as compared to Windows?
>
>
> --
> *Pranay Pratyush,*
> 3rd year undergraduate ,
> Computer Science and Engineering Department
> Indian Institute Of Technology, Kharagpur
> --
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Aleksey Bragin <alek...@reactos.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Same for me. The idea for #reactos and #reactos-dev to exist was the fact
>> that one is for public audience, and the second one is for internal
>> communication between developers.
>>
>> If #reactos-dev is opened to the public, then why not delete it at all
>> and move to #reactos?
>>
>> I rather support Alex's proposal of creating something like #reactos-gsoc
>> or just autovoicing students, it's not a big deal.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Aleksey Bragin
>>
>>
>> On 27.03.2017 11:31, Ged Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> If the restriction is removed, I would be much less inclined to join the
>> channel.
>>
>> I stopped joining #reactos for a reason…
>>
>> Ged.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org
>> <ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org>] *On Behalf Of *Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO
>> *Sent:* 24 March 2017 15:13
>> *To:* 'ReactOS Development List' <ros-dev@reactos.org>
>> <ros-dev@reactos.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] Opening up #reactos-dev to the public
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t approve the idea. The fact is that if the devs quit originally
>> #reactos, it’s because it was generally too noisy, etc… . If we remove the
>> moderation irc bit in #reactos-dev, you may expect the same phenomenon to
>> occur in #reactos-dev too.
>>
>>
>>
>> *De :* Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org
>> <ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org>] *De la part de* David Quintana (gigaherz)
>> *Envoyé :* vendredi 24 mars 2017 11:35
>> *À :* ReactOS Development List
>> *Objet :* Re: [ros-dev] Opening up #reactos-dev to the public
>>
>>
>>
>> I approve the idea.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 24 March 2017 at 11:21, Colin Finck <co...@reactos.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> As you all know, our #reactos-dev IRC channel has been a moderated IRC
>> channel for decades, and only operators (devs) and voiced people can
>> talk. While we always tried to keep discussions dev-related there, no
>> topic has ever been enforced on #reactos. The result is that I see a
>> notable number of developers only on #reactos-dev these days.
>>
>> This is a pretty bad situation! Emerging developers hardly have a way to
>> interact with all existing devs on IRC. Often enough, legitimate
>> questions from them remain unanswered on #reactos. Moreover, we don't
>> maintain the list of voiced people thoroughly, so even some contributors
>> have to ask for temporary voice on #reactos-dev.
>>
>> Keep in mind that we're currently in the GSoC phase where students shall
>> submit their proposals and get in touch with the developers.
>> How are they going to do this on IRC if #reactos-dev continues to be an
>> exclusive club?
>>
>> Because of these reasons, I'm proposing to remove the moderation bit on
>> #reactos-dev and let everybody talk there.
>> Its development topic should be enforced though! As soon as people get
>> too off-topic, they should be directed to #reactos and kicked if nothing
>> else helps. Given that all devs are already operators on #reactos-dev,
>> it's fully in their hands.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Colin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev@reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

Reply via email to