On Saturday 26 November 2005 10:10 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > (in that there are several bugs Guillaume doesn't seem to have been > able to reliably reproduce) that more testers would actually be more > helpful than more time. > > What d'you think?
Let's RC this fucker and get it over with. We're never going to stop finding problems, but the other side is, hell, I've been using it in spite of its problems, and I was using it when it had much worse problems than it does now. At least it's not crashy, and 1.0 is kind of sucky to use by comparison, in subtle ways. Let's just get the ball rolling and try to push for a release that only has bugs that are annoying, but not actually harmful. Then update the FAQ. Like that one with Bluecurve. I really should take a whack at the FAQ (hrm... I wonder if everyone else pronounces FAQ as "fak" and if not, I guess that didn't rhyme if someone said eff-eh-queue.) Started that already, around here somewhere. Needs attention. We need to have an official freeze on changes that would affect translation too, and get the translations updated again. Before we do that, there's one small thing I want to do, which I will make every effort to complete tonight. (Adding some more informative text to the you got an xrun dialog, and a "quit bugging me with this shit" checkbox.) -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
