The OASIS ebXML Collaboration Protocol Profile and Agreement TC Web page is at https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-cppa/, where the current draft (ebCPP-1_11.pdf) of the spec can be obtained. An even newer CPPA Version 1.12 can be found in the e-mail archives at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-cppa/200204/msg00055.html.
As Rachel said, the "CPP/CPA is **NOT** about a registry at all. There is a separate ebXML specification for the registry/repository portion of the ebXML architecture." The examination of the ebXML Registry really comes under the "Discovery" working paper group's aegis: Peter Barry, Joe McVerry, Dick Brooks will be studying UDDI, the ebXML Registry and Kepa's DNS "directory" recommendation. Your working paper group, "Elements of the CPP," will be concentrating mostly on what's needed in the ebXML CPP to support healthcare, and should be able to be designed independently of whatever registry (or registries) the other group recommends. I'll warn you, though, that there probably isn't too much in the CPP/A specification that we can use directly "out of the box" - most of the baggage in there is to support Business Processes and Messaging Services, with nothing at all practically for "legacy" EDI support. That's where we come in: as far as I know, we're the only folks who are working to make the CPP support traditional EDI in a first-class way. Except for the DeliveryChannel stuff in the CPP, you may be on your own for defining partner capabilities as they apply to EDI. Distributing PDF or Word documents seems perfectly okay to me, though I know there are Linux pin-heads (no offense intended, Kepa) out there who get all upset at the idea of using anything M$ related!! William J. Kammerer Novannet, LLC. +1 (614) 487-0320 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher J. Feahr, OD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, 20 April, 2002 06:43 PM Subject: RE: Data Elements for the WEDI-SNIP-CPP Rachel, Thanks for clarifying the relationship between the CPP specification and the separate CPP registry-structure specification. If I understand the immediate task assigned to me, Dave, and Marcallee, however, it is to propose a list of data elements that we consider important in the "WEDI-SNIP CPP". I'm not sure I understand how am I getting off into "left field" with this? I'm sure it's buried in the email archive, but can you point me again to the draft "CPP/A specification"? I think what we are after here is just a list of data elements, but I would welcome any further light you can shed on the task I volunteered to help with a few weeks ago. William: Given the unwieldy nature of this email-narrative type knowledge we've accumulated over the last few months, what format would you suggest for group collaboration on some draft documents? I'm just now installing Adobe Acrobat 5.0 and I believe that it allows many people to mark up .pdf documents posted on a web site, using signed notes, etc. Is something like this feasible? The free .pdf reader would allow the whole group to read the document and the notes, but I think you'd have to have the full version of Acrobat to actually mark up the draft copy. I see a need to move this effort to a more organized level, starting with drafts of: 1. Mission and requirements list 2. Definitions of terms used in "addressing and routing" 3. Proposed data elements for the CPP record Thanks, -Chris At 04:42 PM 4/20/02 -0500, Rachel Foerster wrote: >Chris, it's very important that you get the most current specs (draft) on >the CPP/A specification to see what it specifies. I fear (no pun intended!) >that you may be moving way off into left field where you may not want to >be....perhaps yet. Let's get the core of the CPP done first. > >Rachel Foerster Christopher J. Feahr, OD http://visiondatastandard.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268
