roxen  

Messages by Date

• 2009/03/12 Re: Gathering interest in roxen cron like rxml processor David Hunter
• 2009/03/12 Re: Gathering interest in roxen cron like rxml processor Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/03/12 Re: Gathering interest in roxen cron like rxml processor David Hunter
• 2009/03/11 Re: Gathering interest in roxen cron like rxml processor David Hunter
• 2009/03/11 Re: Gathering interest in roxen cron like rxml processor Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/03/11 Gathering interest in roxen cron like rxml processor David Hunter
• 2009/03/10 &client.tm;, trivia question Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/03/05 Re: Decoding bug (and fix) for multipart/form-data ? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/28 Decoding bug (and fix) for multipart/form-data ? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/26 Lazy evaluation of entities is not so lazy? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/23 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/23 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/02/23 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/23 RE: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/02/22 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/02/22 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Michael Stenitzer
• 2009/02/22 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Martin Bähr
• 2009/02/22 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/22 RE: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/02/21 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/21 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Michael Stenitzer
• 2009/02/21 Re: <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/21 <script> tag which does not RXML parse its content Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/15 Re: Bug in "environment" ? Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/15 Re: Bug in "environment" ? Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/02/15 Re: Bug in "environment" ? Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/14 Re: Bug in "environment" ? Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/02/14 Re: Bug in "environment" ? Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/14 Re: Bug in "environment" ? Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/02/14 Re: Bug in "environment" ? Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/14 Re: Bug in "environment" ? Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/02/14 Bug in "environment" ? Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/12 Re: Database permissions Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/12 Re: Database permissions Sascha Nemecek
• 2009/02/12 Database permissions Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/12 Re: <set expr= /> changed? Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/12 Re: <set expr= /> changed? Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/02/12 Re: <set expr= /> changed? Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/02/12 <set expr= /> changed? Marc Dirix
• 2009/02/10 Re: Update (Re: RFC: Automated CAPTCHA tag in vform) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/02/10 Re: Update (Re: RFC: Automated CAPTCHA tag in vform) Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/30 Re: Latest version(s) of (my) public patches for Roxen 5.0 Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/30 Latest version(s) of (my) public patches for Roxen 5.0 Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/30 Another fix (Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/30 Re: Tiny fix included (Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/30 Re: Tiny fix included (Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly) Martin Jonsson
• 2009/01/29 Update (Re: RFC: Automated CAPTCHA tag in vform) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/29 RFC: Automated CAPTCHA tag in vform Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/29 Tiny fix included (Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/26 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Martin Jonsson
• 2009/01/23 Re: <append /> incompatibility between 4.5 and 5.0? Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/22 Re: <append /> incompatibility between 4.5 and 5.0? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/22 Re: <append /> incompatibility between 4.5 and 5.0? David Hunter
• 2009/01/22 <append /> incompatibility between 4.5 and 5.0? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/22 Re: Git repo? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/22 Re: Git repo? Boyd Lynn Gerber
• 2009/01/22 Re: Git repo? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/22 Re: Git repo? Boyd Lynn Gerber
• 2009/01/22 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/22 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/22 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/21 And one critical patch extra (Re: New patch series, updated and rebased) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 New patch series, updated and rebased Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/21 Re: Git repo? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 Re: Git repo? Bill Welliver
• 2009/01/21 Re: Git repo? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 Git repo? Boyd Lynn Gerber
• 2009/01/21 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Henrik Grubbström
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Martin Jonsson
• 2009/01/21 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Henrik Grubbström
• 2009/01/21 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/21 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/21 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/21 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Henrik Grubbström
• 2009/01/21 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/21 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/20 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 Re: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/20 Re: Roxen and SSL Velpi
• 2009/01/20 Re: [PATCH 01/17] Retrofix the default portnumbers into the URI, Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/20 Re: [PATCH 02/17] Simplify logic, drop redundant code Henrik Grubbström
• 2009/01/20 Re: [PATCH 02/17] Simplify logic, drop redundant code Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 RE: [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/20 Re: [PATCH 02/17] Simplify logic, drop redundant code Henrik Grubbström
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 17/17] Support LOCALDIR preset everywhere Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 12/17] Make ImageCache authentication configurable Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 07/17] Expose MySQL options to the webadmin Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 15/17] New module: controlled variable expansion Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 16/17] New module: autosplitted virtual-host logfiles Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 13/17] Add support to StringFile to be used in writing. Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 06/17] Preserve SQL sessions while parsing one RXML page Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 04/17] Allow more functions in expr Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 11/17] Cater for lost connections during the last query. Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 14/17] New module: gzip-on-the-fly Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 10/17] Add support for bytea encoding Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 08/17] Tie up dangling SQL-transactions at the end of an RXML session Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 09/17] Add support for csv quoting Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 05/17] Avoid null-dereference when the file doesn't exist (pathinfo) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 03/17] Add a few forgotten not_query assignments Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 01/17] Retrofix the default portnumbers into the URI, Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/20 [PATCH 02/17] Simplify logic, drop redundant code Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/18 Re: SQL-session reuse in thread Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/18 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/18 Re: git issues Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/17 Re: SQL-session reuse in thread Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/17 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/17 git issues (was: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Martin Bähr
• 2009/01/17 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/17 Re: SQL-session reuse in thread Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/14 Re: imap module Marc Dirix @ Electronics Design
• 2009/01/14 Re: imap module Marc Dirix
• 2009/01/14 Re: imap module David Hunter
• 2009/01/14 SQL-session reuse in thread (Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/14 imap module Marc Dirix
• 2009/01/12 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/12 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Fredrik Noring
• 2009/01/12 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/12 Re: A few new latest bugfixes relative to Roxen 5.0 Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/12 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Fredrik Noring
• 2009/01/12 Re: POST variables (Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/12 Re: POST variables (Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/12 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/12 Re: A few new latest bugfixes relative to Roxen 5.0 Jonas Wallden
• 2009/01/12 Re: POST variables (Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/12 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/12 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/12 RE: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/12 POST variables (Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/11 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Jonas Walldén
• 2009/01/11 Re: A few new latest bugfixes relative to Roxen 5.0 Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/11 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/10 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/10 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/09 Re: query-cache-size = 32M Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/09 RE: query-cache-size = 32M (Was: Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/09 Re: query-cache-size = 32M (Was: Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Kai Voigt
• 2009/01/09 Re: query-cache-size = 32M (Was: Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/09 RE: query-cache-size = 32M (Was: Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2009/01/09 Re: query-cache-size = 32M (Was: Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/09 query-cache-size = 32M (Was: Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/09 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/09 Re: DB sessions in a single RXML page reuses the same connection? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/08 Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/08 Updated list, cleaned up (Re: Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat) Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/07 Re: A few new latest bugfixes relative to Roxen 5.0 Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/07 A few new latest bugfixes relative to Roxen 5.0 Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/07 Lots of patches that can be integrated into Roxen 5.0 in a heartbeat Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/07 Re: DB sessions in a single RXML page reuses the same connection? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2009/01/06 Re: DB sessions in a single RXML page reuses the same connection? Martin Stjernholm
• 2009/01/05 DB sessions in a single RXML page reuses the same connection? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/12/19 User Filesystem and Default servers Marc Dirix
• 2008/10/09 Re: Problem with value-of in contents tag Martin Stjernholm
• 2008/10/08 Re: Problem with value-of in contents tag Petter Larsson
• 2008/10/08 Problem with value-of in contents tag Petter Larsson
• 2008/08/21 Re: sql_null in Roxen 5.0 Martin Stjernholm
• 2008/08/19 Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Matt Hardy
• 2008/08/19 Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Bill Welliver
• 2008/08/18 Re: sql_null in Roxen 5.0 Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/18 sql_null in Roxen 5.0 Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/18 Re: FYI, this fix in Roxen was already fixed in Pike 7.7 Jonas Wallden
• 2008/08/18 Re: FYI, this fix in Roxen was already fixed in Pike 7.7 Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/18 Re: FYI, this fix in Roxen was already fixed in Pike 7.7 Martin Bähr
• 2008/08/18 FYI, this fix in Roxen was already fixed in Pike 7.7 Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/18 Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Arne Goedeke
• 2008/08/15 Re: [caudium-general] Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Matt Hardy
• 2008/08/15 Re: [caudium-general] Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Bill Welliver
• 2008/08/14 Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Bertrand LUPART
• 2008/08/14 Re: mailing list archives? H. William Welliver III
• 2008/08/14 Re: mailing list archives? Michael Stenitzer
• 2008/08/13 mailing list archives? Bill Welliver
• 2008/08/13 Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Matt Hardy
• 2008/08/13 Re: Cannot encode objects without _encode? Martin Stjernholm
• 2008/08/13 Re: Cannot encode objects without _encode? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/13 Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Martin Bähr
• 2008/08/13 Re: Informal Pike meet-up in September? Henrik Grubbström
• 2008/08/13 Re: Cannot encode objects without _encode? Henrik Grubbström
• 2008/08/12 Re: rimage Bertrand LUPART
• 2008/08/12 RE: rimage Arjan van Staalduijnen
• 2008/08/12 Re: Roxen and SSL Marc Dirix
• 2008/08/12 Re: Roxen and SSL Bertrand LUPART
• 2008/08/12 rimage Bertrand LUPART
• 2008/08/11 Re: Roxen 5.0, Pike 7.7, and a bunch of patches in git Henry M. Umansky
• 2008/08/11 Re: Roxen 5.0, Pike 7.7, and a bunch of patches in git Martin Bähr
• 2008/08/11 Re: Roxen 5.0, Pike 7.7, and a bunch of patches in git Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/11 Re: Roxen 5.0, Pike 7.7, and a bunch of patches in git Henry M. Umansky
• 2008/08/11 Re: Roxen 5.0, Pike 7.7, and a bunch of patches in git Henry M. Umansky
• 2008/08/11 Roxen 5.0, Pike 7.7, and a bunch of patches in git Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/11 Re: Cannot encode objects without _encode? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/10 Informal Pike meet-up in September? H. William Welliver III
• 2008/08/10 Re: Cannot encode objects without _encode? Stephen R. van den Berg
• 2008/08/06 Re: Roxen and SSL Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC

• Earlier messages
• Later messages