In message <dad96b7e52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Like many of us I used an Iyonix as my main RISC OS computer before
>> adopting RPCEmu. After using the latter (0.8.9 Recompiler version)
>> daily for 4 months on a fast PC, it is clear to me that the Iyonix is
>> outperformed in most respects, and the benchmarking I have done
>> (!Firebench, !ROmark) supports this impression.
>
> No Iyonix here, but some other results using FireBench v0.4:
>
> machine secs frames relative
> /sec speed, %
>
> StrongARM RiscPC 75.61 211.61 100
> Win7hp32bit/RPCEmu0.8.9/RO4.39 39.19 408.26 193
> Win7hp32bit/RPCEmu0.8.9/RO5.19 28.39 563.57 266
>
> Win7 runs on a machine with a 1.60GHz core-duo processor.
>
I have an Iyonix, and it performed as follows (approximately - I
didn't take note of the decimal points). Also included, RPCEMu
prformance here (PC has a 3.4GHz Core i7-2600 processor):
machine secs frames relative
speed, %
Iyonix 36 444 210
W7hp64bit/RPCE0.8.9/4.02 17.57 911 430
W7hp64bit/RPCE0.8.8/5..17 14.3 1119 529
For an explanation of the speed difference between RO 4.XX and 5.XX
see this thread http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/10/topics/961
George
--
george greenfield
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
