In message <0326ac7e52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
Tony Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11 Apr 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> In message <dad96b7e52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>
>> Tony Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> > No Iyonix here, but some other results using FireBench v0.4:
>> >
>> > machine secs frames relative
>> > /sec speed, %
>> >
>> > StrongARM RiscPC 75.61 211.61 100
>> > Win7hp32bit/RPCEmu0.8.9/RO4.39 39.19 408.26 193
>> > Win7hp32bit/RPCEmu0.8.9/RO5.19 28.39 563.57 266
>> >
>> > Win7 runs on a machine with a 1.60GHz core-duo processor.
>>
>> I have an Iyonix, and it performed as follows (approximately - I
>> didn't take note of the decimal points). Also included, RPCEMu
>> prformance here (PC has a 3.4GHz Core i7-2600 processor):
>>
>> machine secs frames relative
>> speed, %
>>
>> Iyonix 36 444 210
>> W7hp64bit/RPCE0.8.9/4.02 17.57 911 430
>> W7hp64bit/RPCE0.8.8/5.17 14.3 1119 529
>>
>> For an explanation of the speed difference between RO 4.XX and 5.XX
>> see this thread http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/10/topics/961
>
> Interesting. For you, RPCEmu runs about twice as fast as for me, which
> reflects the relative speeds of the Win7 processors.
>
> Tony
But we're both trumped by Chris Gransden's results for the BB-XM and
Pandaboard ...:-)
George
--
george greenfield
_______________________________________________
Rpcemu mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
