On 11 Apr 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]> wrote: > In message <dad96b7e52.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk> > Tony Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip] > > No Iyonix here, but some other results using FireBench v0.4: > > > > machine secs frames relative > > /sec speed, % > > > > StrongARM RiscPC 75.61 211.61 100 > > Win7hp32bit/RPCEmu0.8.9/RO4.39 39.19 408.26 193 > > Win7hp32bit/RPCEmu0.8.9/RO5.19 28.39 563.57 266 > > > > Win7 runs on a machine with a 1.60GHz core-duo processor. > > I have an Iyonix, and it performed as follows (approximately - I > didn't take note of the decimal points). Also included, RPCEMu > prformance here (PC has a 3.4GHz Core i7-2600 processor): > > machine secs frames relative > speed, % > > Iyonix 36 444 210 > W7hp64bit/RPCE0.8.9/4.02 17.57 911 430 > W7hp64bit/RPCE0.8.8/5.17 14.3 1119 529 > > For an explanation of the speed difference between RO 4.XX and 5.XX > see this thread http://www.riscosopen.org/forum/forums/10/topics/961 Interesting. For you, RPCEmu runs about twice as fast as for me, which reflects the relative speeds of the Win7 processors. Tony _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
